Iranian Review for UN Studies

Iranian Review for UN Studies

Publication Ethics

This publication ethics policy reflects our journal’s commitment to fostering ethical, high-quality scholarly communication. By adhering to these principles, we aim to contribute to the global research community’s integrity, innovation, and inclusivity. Stakeholders are encouraged to familiarize themselves with and uphold these guidelines to ensure a trustworthy and responsible publication process. This policy is informed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines and aligns with internationally recognized ethical standards upheld by leading academic publishers.

 

  1. Commitment to Truth and Integrity

Our journal is committed to upholding the principles of truth and integrity in all published works. Authors, editors, and reviewers are expected to adhere to the highest standards of honesty in presenting, interpreting, and discussing research findings. Misrepresentation, fabrication, or falsification of data is strictly prohibited.

Importance: Ensuring that published content is reliable and credible is fundamental to maintaining the trust of the research community and the public. This commitment underpins the scientific process and promotes knowledge advancement.

 

  1. Originality and Avoidance of Plagiarism

All submissions must be original and must not have been published elsewhere, except in forms such as abstracts or theses. Authors are required to appropriately credit the work of others through proper citation and referencing.

Importance: Protecting intellectual property and fostering innovation depend on rigorous originality checks. Plagiarism undermines trust in academic publishing and violates ethical standards. IRUNS uses Turnitin and Samim for similarity test for submitted papers in English, French, and Persian.

 

  1. Transparency in Research and Authorship

Authors must disclose all funding sources, potential conflicts of interest, and the contributions of each co-author. Clear and accurate authorship attribution ensures accountability and transparency in collaborative research.

Importance: Transparent disclosure builds trust and ensures that research outputs are evaluated fairly and impartially, free from hidden biases or motivations.

 

  1. Clear Submission and Copyright Guidelines

Submissions must adhere to our journal’s guidelines, ensuring the work complies with copyright and licensing requirements. Authors retain or transfer copyright as agreed upon at the time of publication, and any use of third-party materials must have explicit permissions.

Importance: Clear guidelines prevent legal and ethical breaches, safeguarding both authors’ rights and the journal’s reputation.

 

  1. Comprehensive Peer Review Process

The peer review process is central to ensuring the quality and validity of published research. Manuscripts are evaluated by qualified reviewers based on academic merit, originality, and adherence to ethical standards.

Importance: Peer review enhances the credibility and rigor of scholarly publications, helping identify potential errors or ethical concerns before publication.

 

  1. Accountability and Error Rectification

If errors or inaccuracies are identified in published articles, the journal will act promptly to issue corrections, retractions, or expressions of concern as necessary. Authors are encouraged to cooperate in addressing such issues transparently.

Importance: Maintaining the integrity of the scholarly record requires prompt correction of errors, ensuring that readers can rely on published content.

 

  1. Ethical Use of Human and Animal Data

Research involving human participants or animals must comply with ethical guidelines, including obtaining informed consent, ensuring confidentiality, and minimizing harm. Authors must provide details of ethical approval by relevant institutional review boards.

Importance: Respecting the rights and welfare of research subjects is critical to maintaining public trust and upholding ethical principles in research.

 

  1. Conflict of Interest Disclosure

Authors, editors, and reviewers must disclose any financial or personal relationships that could influence their work. This includes funding sources, affiliations, and other potential biases.

Importance: Disclosing conflicts of interest promotes impartiality and ensures the credibility of research findings.

 

  1. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Research

The journal encourages diversity and inclusion in research practices, ensuring fair representation of different perspectives, disciplines, and communities. Authors must avoid biases related to gender, ethnicity, or socio-economic status in their research.

Importance: Diverse perspectives enrich the research process, fostering innovation and inclusivity in scholarly work.

 

  1. Clarity on Authorship Criteria

Authorship must reflect significant contributions to the conception, design, analysis, or writing of the research. Changes to authorship after submission must be approved by all co-authors and the editorial team.

Importance: Clear authorship criteria prevent disputes and ensure that credit is given fairly, reflecting actual contributions to the work.

 

  1. Proper Attribution and Citation Practices

Authors must provide accurate citations for all sources, ensuring proper acknowledgment of prior research. Failure to cite appropriately constitutes plagiarism.

Importance: Accurate citations situate new research within the broader academic discourse, respecting intellectual contributions.

 

  1. Guidelines for Special Issue Submissions

Guest editors and authors involved in special issues must follow the journal’s submission and ethical standards. All special issue content undergoes the same rigorous peer review process as regular submissions.

Importance: Consistency in editorial practices maintains the journal’s standards and prevents ethical discrepancies in special issues.

 

  1. Ethical Use of Technology and Artificial Intelligence

Authors must disclose the use of AI tools in their research, including data analysis or manuscript preparation. AI-generated content must comply with ethical standards, ensuring transparency and accountability.

Importance: The responsible use of AI ensures that ethical standards are upheld and that human oversight remains central to the research process.

 

  1. Respect for Disciplinary and Cultural Norms

Research must respect the norms and expectations of the discipline and cultural context in which it is conducted. Authors should familiarize themselves with journal policies when crossing disciplines.

Importance: Acknowledging diverse norms fosters mutual respect and ensures that research is ethically and culturally sensitive.

 

  1. Reproducibility and Responsible Data Sharing

Authors are encouraged to share data and methodologies openly, enabling other researchers to validate and build upon their work. Data sharing must comply with ethical standards, including privacy considerations.

Importance: Transparency in data and methods fosters reproducibility, a cornerstone of reliable scientific inquiry, while safeguarding sensitive information.

 

Implementation of Ethical Guidelines

To ensure adherence to this publication ethics policy, the journal implements the following measures:

  • Editorial Oversight: The editorial board oversees compliance with ethical standards at all stages of the publication process.
  • Training for Reviewers and Editors: Regular workshops and resources on ethical practices are provided.
  • Ethics Audits: The journal periodically reviews its practices using COPE’s audit guidelines to identify areas for improvement.
  • Complaint Mechanism: A transparent mechanism allows authors, reviewers, or readers to report ethical concerns, which will be investigated promptly and impartially.