WTO Accession Commitments: A Law and Development Perspective

Document Type: Original Article

Author

Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Regardless of the debates concerning the impact of the world trading system on developing countries’ “policy space,” evidence shows that a handful of these economies have been able to take advantage of the rules of the game to pursue their development objectives. The case of accession to the World Trade Organization is not an exception. However unruly and unfair, WTO accessions can either contribute to or hamper development depending on the details of accession commitments as well as the level of serious engagement on the part of the applicant county. Those acceding countries that were able to locate accession in their pre-determined development strategy, rather than an aim in itself, utilized this opportunity as a driver of sensible reforms. Rather than being captured by rent-seeking globalizing/neoliberal forces, the accession policy should be used as an instrument to enforce and embed a well-designed industrial development policy in a world of globalized production.
 

Keywords


References

  1. Amsden AH, Hikino T (2000) “The bark is worse than the bite: new WTO law and late industrialization. Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Science 570(1):104-114. doi:10.1177/000271620057000108
  2. Apecu Laker J (2014) African participation at the World Trade Organization: legal and institutional aspects, 1995–2010. Brill Nijhoff, Leiden
  3. Bhagwati JN (2005) Reshaping the WTO. Far Eastern Economic Review 168(2):25-30. doi:10.7916/D8XK8N79
  4. Bienen D, Mihretu ME (2010) The principle of fairness and WTO accession—an appraisal and assessment of consequences. Society of International Economic Law (SIEL), Second Biennial Global Conference, University of Barcelona, July 8-10, 2010. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1633043
  5. Bown CP (2009) Self-enforcing trade: developing countries and WTO settlement. Brookings Institution, Washington, DC
  6. Butkeviciene J, Hayashi M, Ognivtsev V, Yamaoka T (2001) Terms of WTO accession. In: UNCTAD (ed) WTO accession and development policies. United Nations, New York and Geneva, pp 155-179
  7. Carzaniga A, Lim AH, Lee J (2015) Services market opening: salience, results, and meaning. In: Dadush U, Osakwe C (eds) WTO accession and trade multilateralism: case studies and lessons from the WTO at twenty. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 641-663
  8. Cattaneo O, Primo Braga CA (2009) Everything you always wanted to know about WTO accession (but were afraid to ask). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5116. doi:10.1596/1813-9450-5116
  9. Cottier T (2006) From progressive liberalization to progressive regulation in WTO law. Journal of International Economic Law 9(4):779-821. doi:10.1093/jiel/jgl029
  10. Davis C, Wilf M (2011) Joining the club: accession to the WTO/GATT. Paper presented at American Political Science Association (APSA) Annual Meeting, Seattle.
  11. Drabek Z, Woo W (2010) Who should join the WTO and why?: a cost-benefit analysis of WTO membership. In: Drabek Z (ed) Is the world trade organization attractive enough for emerging economies. New York, Palgrave Macmillan
  12. Dunoff J (2007) What is wrong with inactivity?: comment on Nordstrom’s developing countries in the WTO. In: Bermann GA, Mavroidis PC (eds) WTO law and developing countries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 186-194
  13. Ebrill L, Stotsky J,  Gropp R (1999) Revenue implications of trade liberalization. IMF Occasional Paper 180. International Monetary Fund.
  14. Economist (2011, Dec 10) China’s economy and the WTO—all change. http://www.economist.com/node/21541448. Accessed 7 Jul 2017
  15. Evenett S, Primo Braga CA (2006) WTO accession: moving the goalposts?. In: Newfarmer R (ed) Trade, Doha, and development: a window into the issues. World Bank, Washington, DC, pp 227-242
  16. Finger JM (2002) The Doha agenda and development: a view from the Uruguay Round. Asian Development Bank, Manila
  17. Haddad M, Hollweg C, Portugal-Perze A (2015) The Structural reform implications of WTO accession. In: Dadush U, Osakwe C (eds) WTO accession and trade multilateralism: case studies and lessons from the WTO at twenty. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 81-121
  18. Hoekman B (2002) Strengthening the global trade architecture for development: the post-Doha agenda. World Trade Review 1(1):23-45. doi:10.1017/S1474745601001008
  19. Hoekman B (2005) Operationalizing the concept of policy space in the WTO: beyond special and differential treatment. Journal of International Economic Law 8(2):405-424. doi:10.1093/jielaw/jgi027
  20. Hudec R (1987) Developing countries in the GATT legal system. Trade Policy Research Center, London. Re-issued in 2010 by Cambridge University Press
  21. Irwin D, Mavroidis P, Sykes A (2008) The genesis of the GATT. Cambridge University Press, New York
  22. Kavass II (2007) WTO accession: procedure, requirements, and costs. Journal of World Trade 41(3):453-474.
  23. Kessie E, Apea Y (2006) The participation of African countries in the multilateral trading system. African Yearbook of International Law 12(1):9-66. doi:10.1163/221161704X00024
  24. Khor M (2008) The world trading system and development concerns. In: Serra N, Stiglitz JE (eds) The Washington consensus re-considered: towards a new global governance. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 215-259. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199534081.003.0011
  25. Kireyev (2015) The macroeconomic implications of WTO accession. In: Dadush U, Osakwe C (eds) WTO accession and trade multilateralism: case studies and lessons from the WTO at twenty. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 122-160
  26. Lacey S (2007) WTO Accession from the perspective of WTO members: the view from the other side of the table. In: Streatfield J, Lacey S (eds) New reflections on international trade: essays on agriculture, WTO accession, and systemic issues. Cameron May, London
  27. Laird S (2009) Cost of implementation of WTO agreements. In: Drabek Z (ed) Is the World Trade Organization attractive enough for emerging economies?:critical essays on the multilateral trading system. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 333-347
  28. Low P (2007) Is the WTO doing enough for developing countries?. In: Bermann GA, Mavroidis PC (eds) WTO law and developing countries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 324-357
  29. Maggi G, Rodriguez-Clare A (1998) The value of trade agreements in the presence of political pressures. Journal of Political Economy 106(3):574-601. doi:10.1086/250022
  30. Mavroidis PC (2015) Taking care of business: the legal affairs division from the GATT to the WTO. In: Marceau (ed) A history of law and lawyers in the GATT/WTO: the development of the rule of law in the multilateral trading system. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 236-243
  31. Neumayer E (2013) Strategic delaying and concessions extraction in accession negotiations to the World Trade Organization: an analysis of Working Party membership. World Trade Review 12(4):669-692. doi:10.1017/S147474561300013X
  32. Osakwe C (2011) Developing countries and the GATT/WTO rules: dynamic transformations in trade policy behavior and performance. Minnesota Journal of International Law 20(2):639-672. http://minnjil.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Osakwe-Final-Version.pdf. Accessed 7 Jul 2017
  33. Osakwe C (2015) Contributions and lessons from WTO accessions: the present and future of the rules-based multilateral trading system. In: Dadush U, Osakwe C (eds) WTO accession and trade multilateralism: case studies and lessons from the WTO at twenty. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 119-148.
  34. Rodrik D (2007) One economics, many recipes: globalization, institutions, and economic Growth. Princeton University Press, Princeton
  35. Santos A (2012) Carving out policy autonomy for developing countries in the World Trade Organization: the experience of Brazil and Mexico. Virginia Journal of International Law Association 52(3):551-632. 
  36. Serra N and Stiglitz JE (eds) (2008) The Washington consensus re-considered: towards a new global governance. Oxford University Press, New York
  37. Stiglitz JE (2008) The future of global governance. In: Serra N and Stiglitz JE (eds) The Washington consensus re-considered: towards a new global governance. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 309-323
  38. Subramanian A, Wei SJ (2007) The WTO promotes trade, strongly but unevenly. Journal of International Economics 72(1):151-175. doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.07.007
  39. Tang MK, Wei SJ (2009) The value of making commitments externally: evidence from WTO accessions. Journal of International Economics 78(2):216-229. doi: 10.1016/ j.jinteco. 2009.01.008
  40. Trachtman J (2009) Developing countries, the Doha Round, preferences and the right to regulate. In: Thomas C, Trachtman J (eds) Developing countries in the WTO legal system. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 11-128
  41. http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/ditctab2016d2_en.pdf. Accessed 14 Oct 2017
  42. WTO [World Trade Organization] (1995) Accession to the World Trade Organization procedures for negotiations under Article XII—note by the secretariat, WT/ACC/1
  43. WTO [World Trade Organization] (2001) WTO document—Protocol of accession (Working Party Report), China, WT/ACC/CHN/49
  44. WTO [World Trade Organization] (2005) WTO document—Protocol of accession (Working Party Report), Saudi Arabia, WT/L/627
  45. WTO [World Trade Organization] (2011) WTO document—Protocol of Accession (Working Party Report), Russian Federation, WT/MIN(11)/24, WT/L/839
  46. WTO [World Trade Organization] (2014) World tariff profiles. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/tariff_profiles14_e.pdf. Accessed 5 Aug 2015.